Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  3 / 18 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 3 / 18 Next Page
Page Background

Inst itut Català d'Oncologia

Institut Català d’Oncol gia

Phase III:

Nivolumab

vs Monotherapy vs

Pembrolizumab

•240

•169

•132

•98

•76

•45

•27

•12

•3

•121

•88

•51

•32

•22

•9

•4

•3

•0

•

Months

•0

•3

•6

•9

•12

•15

•18

•21

•24

•

OS (%)

•0

•10

•20

•30

•40

•50

•60

•70

•80

•100

•90

•

Nivo

•

IC

•

No. of patients at risk

19.7%

•

34.0%

•

21.5%

•

8.3%

Checkmate 141

vs

Keynote 040

Median OS,

mo (95% CI)

HR

(97.73% CI)

p-

value

Nivolumab (n = 240)

7.5 (5.5, 9.1)

0.70

(0.51, 0.96)

0.0101

IC (n = 121)

5.1 (4.0, 6.0)

•Ferris RL, et al.

N Engl J Med

2016;375:1856–1867.

•Cohen E, et al. ESMO 2017

•Independientemente status PDL1