Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  10 / 30 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 10 / 30 Next Page
Page Background

Reference

Antibodies

N Concordance of LDT vs FDA-

approved assay

Neuman, T et al. J Thorac Oncol

2016

22C3 on 3 platforms

41

85%

Cogswell, J et al. Mol Diag Ther

2017

28-8, E1L3N

20

28-8 more sensitive

Scheel, AH et al. Mod Pathol 2016

SP142, SP263, 28-8, 22C3, E1L3N

30

55% of concordance

Scheel, AH et al. Histopathology

2018

SP142, SP263, 28-8, 22C3, E1L3N ,

Q1R (11 different LDT)

21

42% of concordance

Smith, J et al. Diag Pathol 2016

SP263, E1L3N

100

SP263 more sensitive than E1L3N

Rimm, DL et al. JAMA Oncol 2017

SP142, 28-8, 22C3, E1L3N

90

E1L3N similar to 28-8 and higher than 22C3

Adam, J et al. Ann Oncol 2018

SP263, 28-8, 22C3, E1L3N

41

51.8% of concordance

Conde, E, et al. Histopathol 2017

SP263, SP142, E1L3N

40

Similar

Eight key publications for PD-L1

LDT performance in NSCLC