|
Secuencia óptima del tratamiento del CCRm: ¿Cuál es el papel del panitumumab?. |
1 |
|
Advances in the treatment of mCRC |
2 |
|
ESMO guidelines: mCRC treatment |
3 |
|
The importance of 1st-line treatment choice in mCRC |
4 |
|
Is there a treatment of choice in first-line of treatment in mCRC? |
5 |
|
Número de diapositiva 6 |
6 |
|
Número de diapositiva 7 |
7 |
|
Meta-analysis of 1st-line anti-EGFR vs anti-VEGF in wtRAS mCRC |
8 |
|
Response Rate |
9 |
|
Disease Free Survival |
10 |
|
Overall Survival |
11 |
|
ESMO guidelines: mCRC treatment |
12 |
|
Considerations for sequencing anti-EGFRvs anti-VEGF mAb therapy in mCRC |
13 |
|
PEAK: ETS, DoR, TTR and DpR (RASwt, final analysis) |
14 |
|
PEAK, PRIME, PLANET: Impact of ETS and DoR on survival |
15 |
|
PEAK, PRIME, PLANET: Impact of ETS and DoR on survival |
16 |
|
Considerations for sequencing anti-EGFRvs anti-VEGF mAb therapy in mCRC |
17 |
|
Anti-EGFR-resistant cells may remain sensitive toanti-VEGF mAb therapy |
18 |
|
Reduced activity of EGFR targeting antibodies following exposure toanti-VEGF mAb therapy |
19 |
|
PRIME Post-progression anti-VEGF therapy (post-hoc analysis) |
20 |
|
PRIME: OS by post-progression anti-VEGF therapy (wt RAS) |
21 |
|
PRIME: OS by post-progression anti-VEGF therapy (wt RAS) |
22 |
|
Impact of Sequence of Biologic Therapies on OS in wtRAS CRC: An Exploratory, Retrospective Pooled Analysis (PEAK, PRIME, 181) |
23 |
|
Número de diapositiva 27 |
24 |
|
Número de diapositiva 28 |
25 |
|
Número de diapositiva 29 |
26 |
|
COMETS: Efficacy results |
27 |
|
Does Bevacizumab impact antiEGFR efficacy in wtRAS mCRC? |
28 |
|
Does Bevacizumab impact antiEGFR efficacy in wtRAS mCRC? |
29 |
|
Planned Phase 3 study Biological sequencing |
30 |
|
Conclusiones |
31 |


