Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  7 / 49 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 7 / 49 Next Page
Page Background

DFS (ITT Population)

Abstract ID: 8717

Patients with events, n (%)

16 (31.4)

22 (43.1)

Median DFS, months

(95% CI)

42.41

( 31.67, -)

20.96

( 12.29, 32.36)

HR (95% CI)

0.268 ( 0.136, 0.531)

P-value (log-rank test)

<0.001

P-value (stratified log-rank test)

<0.001

Data cut-off date: 2017-Jun-15, Median follow-up time was 33.2 months for Erlotinib and 28.1 months for NP

0

12

24

36

48

60

Time (Months)

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

DFS probability

Patients at Risk

Erlotinib

NP

51

51

42

22

29

13

9

3

0

0

NP

Censored

Erlotinib

81.35%

44.62%

Erlotinib

(n=51)

NP

(n=51)

2-year DFSR, %

81.35

44.62

P-value

<0.001

3-year DFSR, %

54.24

19.83

P-value

0.011

54.24%

19.83%

Efficacy and Safety of Erlotinib vs Vinorelbine/Cisplatin as Adjuvant Therapy for Stage IIIA

EGFR

Mutant NSCLC Patients (EVAN, NCT01683175)