Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  19 / 25 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 19 / 25 Next Page
Page Background

RECORD-1

(N=416)

4

CheckMate-025

(N=821)

5

METEOR

(N=658)

6,7

HOPE 205

(N=153)

8,9

ALTERNATIVA

Everolimus

Nivolumab

Cabozantinib

Lenvatinib +

everolimus

COMPARADOR

Placebo

Everolimus

(mTORi)

Everolimus

(mTORi)

Everolimus

(mTORi)

MEDIANA SLP

HR(95% CI)

4.9 vs 1.9

0.33 (0.25–0.43)

p<0.001

4.6 vs 4.4

0.88 (0.75–1.03)

p<0.11

7.4 vs 3.8

0.58 (0.45–0.75)

p<0.001

12.8 vs 5.6

0.45 (0.27–0.79)

p=0.029

MEDIANA SG

HR(95% CI)

14.8 vs 14.4

0.87 (0.65–1.15)

p=0.162

25.0 vs 19.6

0.73 (0.57–0.93)

p=0.002

21.4 vs 16.5

0.66 (0.53–0.83)

p=0.00026

25.5 vs 15.4

0.68 (0.41–1.14)

p=0.12

RESPUESTAS

OBJETIVAS (%)

1.8 vs 0

NA

25 vs 5

p<0.001

17 vs 3

p<0.0001

35 vs 0

p<0.0001

EFICACIA TERAPÉUTICA EN 2ª y SUBSIGUIENTES LÍNEAS

4. Motzer RJ,

et al. Cancer

2010;116:4256–65;

5. Motzer RJ,

et al. NEJM

2015;373:1803–13; 6. Choueiri TK,

et al. NEJM

2015;373:1814–23; 7. Choueiri TK, et al

. Lancet Oncol

2016;17:917–27

; 8.

Motzer RJ,

et al

.

Lancet Oncol

2015;16:1473–82 8; 9. Motzer RJ,

et al. Lancet Oncol

2016;17:e4–5

.